Introduction to Quantum Mechanics · Problem 6.20

Symmetries and Conservation Laws — David J. Griffiths

Physics — Quantum Mechanics · scalar_operator_selection_rules

Problem

Show that the commutator [L^−, f^]=0\left[\hat{L}_-,\,\hat{f}\right] = 0 leads to the same rule, Equation 6.46, as does the commutator [L^+, f^]=0\left[\hat{L}_+,\,\hat{f}\right] = 0.
Intuitive explanation

The lowering operator L^−\hat{L}_- and raising operator L^+\hat{L}_+ are related by hermitian conjugation, so their commutation relations with any observable encode the same physical constraint—just approached from opposite ends of the ladder. Working through [L^−,f^]=0[\hat{L}_-, \hat{f}] = 0 will algebraically yield the same selection rule or eigenvalue condition as [L^+,f^]=0[\hat{L}_+, \hat{f}] = 0 because you're essentially proving the same statement about which angular momentum states can couple to f^\hat{f}. The key is recognizing that both paths must converge to the same boundary condition.

Intuitive explanation

The lowering operator L^−\hat{L}_- and raising operator L^+\hat{L}_+ are related by hermitian conjugation, so their commutation relations with any observable encode the same physical constraint—just approached from opposite ends of the ladder. Working through [L^−,f^]=0[\hat{L}_-, \hat{f}] = 0 will algebraically yield the same selection rule or eigenvalue condition as [L^+,f^]=0[\hat{L}_+, \hat{f}] = 0 because you're essentially proving the same statement about which angular momentum states can couple to f^\hat{f}. The key is recognizing that both paths must converge to the same boundary condition.

Related theory

Browse the problem library