Mathematics

Mathematics

Problem

The function f:R→Rf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R is given by f(x)=x2f(x)=x^{2}. A relation gg is formed by interchanging xx and yy in y=f(x)y=f(x), yielding g(x)=xg(x)=\sqrt{x}. Which statement correctly explains why f∘gf\circ g does NOT equal the identity on R\mathbb R? a) Because ff is not one–one on R\mathbb R, its inverse is not a function, so f∘gf\circ g cannot be the identity. b) Because gg is defined only for x≥0x\ge 0, the composition f∘gf\circ g is defined only for x≥0x\ge 0 and thus is not the identity on all of R\mathbb R. c) Because taking the square root gives two possible values ±x\pm\sqrt{x}, gg is not single-valued, so the composition cannot recover xx. d) Because f(g(x))=(x)2=∣x∣f(g(x))=(\sqrt{x})^{2}=|x|, the composition equals the absolute value of xx, not xx itself.
Intuitive explanation

When you compose a function with its "inverse," you expect to get back what you started with—but only if that inverse is actually a valid function on the same domain. Here, g(x)=xg(x)=\sqrt{x} is only defined for x≥0x \geq 0, so f∘gf \circ g can only be computed there. More fundamentally, ff isn't one-to-one on all of R\mathbb{R} (both 22 and −2-2 map to 44), so swapping xx and yy doesn't produce a true function inverse. The composition works on [0,∞)[0,\infty), but fails on negative inputs where gg doesn't even exist.

Intuitive explanation

When you compose a function with its "inverse," you expect to get back what you started with—but only if that inverse is actually a valid function on the same domain. Here, g(x)=xg(x)=\sqrt{x} is only defined for x≥0x \geq 0, so f∘gf \circ g can only be computed there. More fundamentally, ff isn't one-to-one on all of R\mathbb{R} (both 22 and −2-2 map to 44), so swapping xx and yy doesn't produce a true function inverse. The composition works on [0,∞)[0,\infty), but fails on negative inputs where gg doesn't even exist.

Browse the problem library