Chemistry

Chemistry

Problem

For the reaction 2 NO2(g)+F2(g)→2 NO2F(g)2\,\text{NO}_{2}(g) + \text{F}_{2}(g) \to 2\,\text{NO}_{2}\text{F}(g) the measured rate law is rate=k[NO2]2\text{rate} = k[\text{NO}_{2}]^2. A chemist proposes the mechanism (1) NO2+F2⇌NO2F+F\text{NO}_{2} + \text{F}_{2} \rightleftharpoons \text{NO}_{2}\text{F} + \text{F} (fast, reversible) (2) NO2+F→NO2F\text{NO}_{2} + \text{F} \to \text{NO}_{2}\text{F} (slow) Explain why F2\text{F}_{2}, although a reactant in the overall balanced equation, does not appear in the rate law.
Intuitive explanation

The key is distinguishing between reactants in the overall equation and reactants in the rate-determining step. Since step (2) is slow, it controls the reaction rate—but F\text{F} is an intermediate produced in the fast step (1), not a starting material. By writing [F][\text{F}] in terms of the equilibrium from step (1), you can eliminate it and express the rate using only the initial reactants NO2\text{NO}_{2} and F2\text{F}_{2}. The fact that F2\text{F}_{2} appears in a fast pre-equilibrium rather than the slow step is why it doesn't show up in the final rate law.

Intuitive explanation

The key is distinguishing between reactants in the overall equation and reactants in the rate-determining step. Since step (2) is slow, it controls the reaction rate—but F\text{F} is an intermediate produced in the fast step (1), not a starting material. By writing [F][\text{F}] in terms of the equilibrium from step (1), you can eliminate it and express the rate using only the initial reactants NO2\text{NO}_{2} and F2\text{F}_{2}. The fact that F2\text{F}_{2} appears in a fast pre-equilibrium rather than the slow step is why it doesn't show up in the final rate law.

Browse the problem library