A student attempts to evaluate the integral
∫x(1+x2)e(1+x2)2dx
by first letting u=1+x2. After this substitution the new integrand still involves eu2. Which of the following best explains why making a second substitution is advantageous at this point?
a) Because one can integrate eu2 directly using ∫eg(u)du=g′(u)eg(u), so introducing a second variable is unnecessary.
b) Because after the first substitution the integrand becomes 21ueu2 and already matches the pattern f′(u)ef(u), implying the antiderivative is simply eu2+C without another substitution.
c) Because eu2 is a composite function whose inner expression u2 prevents direct integration; letting v=u2 changes the integral to the standard form ∫evdv.},{
d) Because replacing u with lnv in a second substitution would turn the exponential into a logarithm, which is easier to integrate than an exponential.