An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory - M. Peskin, D. Schroeder (Perseus, 1995) · Problem 15.5

Non-Abelian Gauge Invariance — M. Peskin, D. Schroeder (Perseus, 1995)

Physics — QFT · non-abelian-gauge-invariance

Problem

Casimir operator computations. An alternative strategy for computing the quadratic Casimir operator is to compute C(r)C(r) in the formula tr[tratrb]=C(r)δab\text{tr}[t^a_r t^b_r] = C(r)\delta^{ab} by choosing tat^a and tbt^b to lie in an SU(2)SU(2) subgroup of the gauge group. (a) Under an SU(2)SU(2) subgroup of a general group GG, an irreducible representation rr of GG will decompose into a sum of representations of SU(2)SU(2): r→∑ji,r \to \sum j_i, where the jij_i are the spins of SU(2)SU(2) representations. Show that 3C(r)=∑iji(ji+1)(2ji+1).3C(r) = \sum_i j_i(j_i+1)(2j_i+1). (b) Under an SU(2)SU(2) subgroup of SU(N)SU(N), the fundamental representation NN transforms as a 2-component spinor (j=12j = \frac{1}{2}) and (N−2)(N-2) singlets. Use this relation to check the formula C(N)=12C(N) = \frac{1}{2}. Show that the adjoint representation of SU(N)SU(N) decomposes into one spin 1, 2(N−2)2(N-2) spin-12\frac{1}{2}'s, plus singlets, and use this decomposition to check that C(G)=NC(G) = N. (c) Symmetric and antisymmetric 2-index tensors form irreducible representations of SU(N)SU(N). Compute C2(r)C_2(r) for each of these representations. The direct sum of these representations is the product representation N×NN \times N. Verify that your results for C2(r)C_2(r) satisfy the identity for product representations that follows from Eqs. (15.100) and (15.101).

Related theory

Browse the problem library