It is sometimes useful to introduce a spurion, which is a fictitious or composite field with the right quantum numbers to parametrize the effects of symmetry breaking, and which can therefore be used as a bookkeeping device. For example, it is known that the effective operator for strangeness-changing nonleptonic weak transitions, which could in principle involve both ΔI=21 and ΔI=23 components, is strongly dominated by ΔI=21. Therefore, the transitions Σ+→π0p, Σ+→π+n, and Σ−→π−n should be related in the same way as the isospin-conserving amplitudes for Σ+S→π0p, Σ+S→π+n, and Σ−S→π−n, where S is a spin-0 spurion carrying I=1/2 and I3=−1/2. Show that the amplitudes (using the Condon-Shortley convention for π+ and Σ+) should be related by
M(Σ+→π+n)−M(Σ−→π−n)=−2M(Σ+→π0p).
This relation, which holds separately for the S and P wave amplitudes (Problem 2.26), works reasonably well. (This simple example could be handled easily using the Wigner-Eckart theorem, but the spurion formalism is more convenient in more complicated cases.)