Classical Electrodynamics · Problem 4.3

Magnetostatics, Faraday's Law, Quasi-Static Fields — John David Jackson

Physics — E&M · cartesian-vs-spherical-multipole-moments

Problem

The llth term in the multipole expansion (4.1) of the potential is specified by the (2l+1)(2l+1) multipole moments qlmq_{lm}. On the other hand, the Cartesian multipole moments, Qαβγ(l)=∫ρ(x)xαyβzγ d3xQ^{(l)}_{\alpha\beta\gamma} = \int \rho(\mathbf{x}) x^\alpha y^\beta z^\gamma \, d^3x with α\alpha, β\beta, γ\gamma nonnegative integers subject to the constraint α+β+γ=l\alpha + \beta + \gamma = l, are (l+1)(l+2)/2(l+1)(l+2)/2 in number. Thus, for l>1l > 1 there are more Cartesian multipole moments than seem necessary to describe the term in the potential whose radial dependence is r−(l+1)r^{-(l+1)}. Show that while the qlmq_{lm} transform under rotations as irreducible spherical tensors of rank ll, the Cartesian multipole moments correspond to reducible spherical tensors of ranks l, l−2, l−4, …, lmin⁡l,\, l-2,\, l-4,\, \ldots,\, l_{\min}, where lmin⁡=0l_{\min} = 0 or 11 for ll even or odd, respectively. Check that the number of different tensorial components adds up to the total number of Cartesian tensors. Why are only the qlmq_{lm} needed in the expansion (4.1)?

Browse the problem library