Orbits · BPhO 2021 #3

Physics · mechanics

Problem

This question is about the mechanics of circular and elliptical orbits. Consider a satellite of mass m in orbit around a planet of mass M such that it is in free fall and sufficiently far from the planet to be able to ignore atmospheric effects. The point of closest approach (perigee) is at a distance rpr_p from the centre of the planet and the highest point in the orbit (apogee) is at a distance rar_a from the centre of the planet. (a) As the orbit is not circular, the equation F=mv2/rF = mv^2/r does not apply at any point in the orbit. However, at the apogee and perigee the velocity vector is perpendicular to the gravitational force. Hence the angular momentum (= mrω where ω is the angular velocity) is constant and at those two points is simply equal to mvara=mvbrbmv_a r_a = mv_b r_b. Use this with the conservation of energy (kinetic + gravitational potential) to derive Newton's vis viva equation (eq. 1) to find the velocity at any given radius of orbit on the ellipse: v2=GM(2r−1a)(eq. 1)v^2 = GM\left(\frac{2}{r} - \frac{1}{a}\right) \quad \text{(eq. 1)} where a=(ra+rp)/2a = (r_a + r_p)/2, the semi-major axis of the ellipse, ra=a(1+e)r_a = a(1 + e) and rp=a(1−e)r_p = a(1 - e), where e is the eccentricity. Note: the largest diameter of an ellipse has a length 2a so that a is the length of the semimajor axis. [4] (b) In order to escape from orbit, the satellite undergoes a single short burn at a specific point in the orbit which gives it a new orbit with infinite semi-major axis. That burn creates a velocity change Δv which is a figure of interest to engineers as it is essentially proportional to the amount of fuel burnt in a given manoeuvre. (i) Find expressions for the necessary Δv to reach escape velocity from apogee (ΔvaΔv_a) and perigee (ΔvpΔv_p). [5] (ii) Hence show that the ratio: ΔvaΔvp=2(1−e)−(1−e)2(1+e)−(1+e)\frac{Δv_a}{Δv_p} = \frac{\sqrt{2(1-e)} - (1-e)}{\sqrt{2(1+e)} - (1+e)} [2] (iii) Recalling that, for an ellipse, 0 < e < 1, show that it requires a greater velocity change to launch a satellite into escape orbit from apogee than from perigee - this may be counter-intuitive! [2] In order to change from one circular orbital radius (r1r_1) to another (r2r_2) in the same orbital plane, a very efficient way is to use the two-burn Hohmann transfer. A brief burn is applied at one point in the orbit which makes the orbit elliptical. The first burn point is the perigee of the ellipse. On reaching the apogee, a second burn is applied to give the necessary velocity to make a circular orbit at the new height. (c) Show that the velocity changes at perigee and apogee are given by: Δvp=GMr1(2r2r1+r2−1)Δv_p = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{r_1}}\left(\sqrt{\frac{2r_2}{r_1+r_2}} - 1\right) and Δva=GMr2(1−2r1r1+r2)Δv_a = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{r_2}}\left(1 - \sqrt{\frac{2r_1}{r_1+r_2}}\right) [5] (d) For a given initial orbit r1r_1, the total Δv=Δva+ΔvpΔv = Δv_a + Δv_p will vary with r2r_2. By differentiation with respect to r2r_2, keeping r1r_1 fixed, show that the maximum value of Δv occurs for the positive root of the equation x3−15x2−9x−1=0x^3 - 15x^2 - 9x - 1 = 0 Where x=r2/r1x = r_2/r_1. This root has the approximate value of 15.6. In other words, it requires more energy to place the satellite in a higher orbit than it does to remove it to escape velocity, another counter-intuitive result! [4]

Browse the problem library