Rederive the equivalent of Eq. (12.2.23) keeping terms of order εxεz2. (You may assume εy=0.) Use this information to rewrite Eq. (12.2.24) to order εxεz2. By equating coefficients of this term deduce the constraint
−2LzPxLz+PxLz2+Lz2Px=ℏ2Px
This seems to conflict with statement (1) made above, but not really, in view of the identity
−2ΛΩΛ+ΩΛ2+Λ2Ω≡[Λ,[Λ,Ω]]
Using the identity, verify that the new constraint coming from the εxεz2 term is satisfied given the commutation relations between Px, Py, and Lz.