Repeat the derivation that led to eqn 33.72 (one of the Kramers–Kronig relations), but this time set y(−t)=y(t), so that y~(ω) is purely real. In this case, prove the other Kramers–Kronig relation, which states that
χ~′′(ω)=−P∫−∞∞πdω′ω′−ωχ~′(ω′).(33.121)